Positioning quality filter for the V2X technologies

ABSTRACT

This provides methods and systems for V2X applications, such as forward collision warning, electronic emergency brake light, left turn assist, work zone warning, signal phase timing, and others, mainly relying on a GNSS positioning solution transmitted via the Dedicated Short-Range Communications (DSRC) to/from the roadside units and onboard units in other V2X-enabled vehicles. However, the positioning solution from a GNSS may be deteriorated by noise and/or bias due to various error sources, e.g., time delay, atmospheric effect, ephemeris effect, and multipath effect. This offers a novel quality filter that can detect noise and the onset of drift in GNSS signals by evaluating up to four metrics that compare the qualities of kinematic variables, speed, heading angle change, curvature, and lateral displacement, obtained directly or derived from GNSS and onboard vehicle sensors. This is used for autonomous cars and vehicle safety, with various examples/variations.

RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a CIP of another co-pending US utility application, namely, Ser. No. 14/883,633, filed 15 Oct. 2015, titled “Methods of tracking pedestrian heading angle using smart phones data for pedestrian safety applications”, recently allowed, which was a CIP of another co-pending US utility application, namely, Ser. No. 14/163,478, filed 24 Jan. 2014, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,435,654, issued 6 Sep. 2016, titled “System and method for creating, storing, and updating local dynamic MAP database with safety attribute”, which is a CIP of another co-pending US utility application, namely, Ser. No. 14/047,157, titled “System and method for map matching”, filed 7 Oct. 2013, now a U.S. Pat. No. 9,037,404, issued on May 19, 2015, which in turn is a CIP of two other co-pending US utility applications, namely, Ser. No. 13/907,864, titled “System and method for lane boundary estimation and host vehicle position and orientation”, filed 1 Jun. 2013, and Ser. No. 13/907,862, titled “System and method for node adaptive filtering and congestion control for safety and mobility applications toward automated vehicles system”, filed 1 Jun. 2013. It is also related to another US patent application filed 24 Jan. 2014, Ser. No. 14/163,258, with the same assignee, titled “System and method for road side equipment of interest selection for active safety applications”. The teachings of all the above applications are incorporated herein, by reference. The current application claims the priority date of the above applications.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Vehicle-to-vehicle (V2V) and vehicle-to-infrastructure (V2I) communication, collectively referred as Vehicle-to-everything (V2X), is a wireless technology for increasing road safety and improving traffic management, with intelligent transport system. It can also include V2P (Vehicle-to-Pedestrian), V2D (Vehicle-to-device), and V2G (Vehicle-to-grid) communications.

The autonomous cars or vehicles are subject of intense research today. The safety is one of the most important issues in this technology. We believe that pedestrians are one of the main actors in this environment. Thus, the pedestrians safety is one of the main issues in our research and development. At Savari, our technology incorporates a platform for pedestrians' safety. The more we guard the pedestrians against the accidents, the less risk is imposed on public, and the more public acceptance for autonomous cars or vehicles is generated.

One aspect of the present invention relates to a system that uses a positioning quality filter for the V2X technologies.

There is no prior art or product in the industry that teaches the following features in our disclosure here.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

This disclosure, e.g., adds the following improvements on our platform technologies, as some of the embodiments:

The V2X applications, such as forward collision warning, electronic emergency brake light, left turn assist, work zone warning, signal phase timing, and others, mainly rely on a GNSS positioning solution transmitted via the Dedicated Short-Range Communications (DSRC) to/from the roadside units and onboard units in other V2X-enabled vehicles. However, the positioning solution from a GNSS may be deteriorated by noise and/or bias due to various error sources, e.g., time delay, atmospheric effect, ephemeris effect, and multipath effect. This invention offers a novel quality filter that can detect noise and the onset of drift in GNSS signals by evaluating up to four metrics that compare the qualities of kinematic variables, speed, heading angle change, curvature, and lateral displacement, obtained directly or derived from GNSS and onboard vehicle sensors.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is for one embodiment, as an example, for representation of development of fully automated vehicles, in stages.

FIG. 2 is for one embodiment of the invention, for a system for automated vehicles.

FIG. 3 is for one embodiment of the invention, for a system for automated vehicles.

FIG. 4 is for one embodiment of the invention, for automated vehicle functional architecture.

FIG. 5 is for one embodiment of the invention, for automated vehicle infrastructure architecture.

FIG. 6 is for one embodiment of the invention, for a system for V2X landscape, with components.

FIG. 7 is for one embodiment of the invention, for a system for framework for V2I applications, with components.

FIG. 8 is for one embodiment of the invention, for a system for automated vehicle command and control (C2) cloud, with components.

FIG. 9 is for one embodiment of the invention, for a system for our (Savari) C2 network, with components, showing communications between networks and vehicles.

FIG. 10 is for one embodiment of the invention, for a system for host vehicle, range of R values, region(s) defined, multiple nodes or vehicles inside and outside region(s), for communications between networks and vehicles, and warning decisions or filtering purposes.

FIG. 11 is for one embodiment of the invention, for a system for host vehicle, range of R values, region(s) defined, for an irregular shape(s), depending on (x,y) coordinates in 2D (dimensional) coordinates, defining the boundaries.

FIG. 12 is for one embodiment of the invention, for a system for automated vehicles, with components, with one or more filtering modules.

FIG. 13 is for one embodiment of the invention, for a system for automated vehicles, with components, with a function F( ), e.g., depending on the velocity of the vehicle, for calculations for Lat and Lon coordinates, and their corresponding deltas or differences.

FIG. 14 is for one embodiment of the invention, for a method for automated vehicles, for adjusting R dynamically, based on rules engine, historical data, user-interface, or neural network.

FIG. 15 is for one embodiment of the invention, for a system for automated vehicles, for filtering module, for direction, velocity, and distance.

FIG. 16 is for one embodiment of the invention, for a system for automated vehicles, for filtering module, for power, power threshold(s), traffic data, maps, topography, R, number of nodes, and rate of change of number of nodes.

FIG. 17 is for one embodiment of the invention, for a system for automated vehicles, for filtering module, for various vehicles.

FIG. 18 is for one embodiment of the invention, for step 1, generating lanes.

FIG. 19 is for one embodiment of the invention, for step 1, generating lanes.

FIG. 20 is for one embodiment of the invention, for step 2, Method 1, constructing Intersection (INTX) Diamond Region.

FIG. 21 is for one embodiment of the invention, for step 2, Method 1, constructing INTX Diamond Region.

FIG. 22 is for one embodiment of the invention, for step 2, Method 1, constructing INTX Diamond Region.

FIG. 23 is for one embodiment of the invention, for step 2, Method3, using lane intersections.

FIG. 24 is for one embodiment of the invention, for step 3, determining lane type.

FIG. 25 is for one embodiment of the invention, for step 4, determining approach set.

FIG. 26 is for one embodiment of the invention, for step 5, determining connection set.

FIG. 27 is for one embodiment of the invention, for a system of creating, storing, and updating local dynamic MAP database with safety attribute.

FIG. 28 is for one embodiment of the invention, for a system of creating, storing, and updating local dynamic MAP database with safety attribute.

FIG. 29 is for one embodiment of the invention, for a system of map generation. It generates maps using vehicle data such as location, speed, and heading, along with time stamp.

FIG. 30 is for one embodiment of the invention, for a system of lane generation. It constructs lanes by clustering vehicles path and combining vehicle paths inside the clusters.

FIG. 31 is for one embodiment of the invention, for a system of determining intersection and lanes splitting. It determines intersection region using vehicles speed profiles, vehicles heading angles, and vehicles travel path intersects.

FIG. 32 is for one embodiment of the invention, for a system of determining Lane type (Ingress/Egress).

FIG. 33 is for one embodiment of the invention, for a system of determining the approach set for every lane.

FIG. 34 is for one embodiment of the invention, for a system of determining connecting lanes and movement state for ingress lane.

FIG. 35 is for one embodiment of the invention, for a system of MAP Generation. Improved map generation uses signal data available from traffic controller.

FIG. 36 is for one embodiment of the invention, for a system of Map maintenance. Abnormal traffic condition is detected by observing the vehicle density profile and the vehicle path matching performance.

FIG. 37 is for one embodiment of the invention, for a system of Map maintenance. Improved map maintenance uses signal data from traffic controller.

FIG. 38 is for one embodiment of the invention, for a system of Map publishing, storing, and updating mechanism.

FIG. 39 is for one embodiment of the invention, for a system of Safety Consideration.

FIG. 40 is for one embodiment of the invention, for a system of creating, storing, and updating local dynamic MAP database with safety attribute.

FIG. 41 is for one embodiment of the invention, for a system, for pedestrians moving at the intersection for a road.

FIG. 42 is for one embodiment of the invention, for a system, for direction, for the angle with respect to the coordinate system, with N-E axes.

FIG. 43 is for one embodiment of the invention, for a system, for direction, for the intended intersection paths, for possibilities.

FIG. 44 is for one embodiment of the invention, for a system, for pedestrian speed, before and after the stop.

FIG. 45 is for one embodiment of the invention, for a system, for pedestrian movement, for positions, plus position at rest.

FIG. 46 is for one embodiment of the invention, for a system, for pedestrian acceleration, with consistent behavior, plus deceleration to stop.

FIG. 47 is for one embodiment of the invention, for a system, for angle, before the stop, plus the delta angle, or the difference in angle.

FIG. 48 is for one embodiment of the invention, for a system, for angle, during the stop.

FIG. 49 is for one embodiment of the invention, for a system, for yaw rate.

FIG. 50 is for one embodiment of the invention, for a system, for yaw rate integration.

FIG. 51 is for one embodiment of the invention, for a system, for acceleration measurements.

FIG. 52 is for one embodiment of the invention, for a system, for intended intersection paths.

FIG. 53 is for one embodiment of the invention, for a system, for position at move and position at rest.

FIG. 54 is for one embodiment of the invention, for a system, for yaw rate and yaw rate integration.

FIG. 55 is for one embodiment of the invention, for a system, for communications between and from telephone company and satellite, to/from person's mobile phone or device, as well as the moving car, to connect the car with the mobile device/phone/smart phone, for understanding the position(s) of the pedestrian(s) at the intersections for the roads, by the moving car, nearby.

FIG. 56 is for one embodiment of the invention, for a method of implementation of tracking pedestrian heading angle using smart phones data for pedestrian safety applications.

FIG. 57 is for one embodiment of the invention, for a flow chart of the method.

FIG. 58 is for one embodiment of the invention, for a flow chart of the method.

FIG. 59 is for one embodiment of the invention, for a system for filter for V2X technology.

FIG. 60 is for one embodiment of the invention, for a system for filter for V2X technology.

FIG. 61 is for one embodiment of the invention, for a system for filter for V2X technology.

FIG. 62 is for one embodiment of the invention, for a system for filter for V2X technology.

FIG. 63 is for one embodiment of the invention, for a system for filter for V2X technology.

FIG. 64 is for one embodiment of the invention, for a system for filter for V2X technology.

FIG. 65 is for one embodiment of the invention, for a system for filter for V2X technology.

FIG. 66 is for one embodiment of the invention, for a system for filter for V2X technology.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

Here, we describe some of the embodiments of our system and method:

Let's look at the details of one method:

Three metrics are considered every time a new GNSS position estimate is provided, and each metric compares kinematic variables obtained from the GNSS and vehicle sensors. When these metrics appear to be within tolerances, the GNSS signal is considered valid.

Each metric is explained in detail in the following sections:

First Metric:

The first metric, M1, compares speed values from GNSS with that from the vehicle sensor sampled within a moving time window of an interval between a past time and the current time. It is described by the ratio:

$\begin{matrix} {{M_{1}\left( t_{c} \right)} = \frac{n\left( \left\{ {{{i\text{:}\mspace{14mu} {{V_{GNSS}^{i} - V_{CAN}^{i}}}} \leq {\Delta \; V_{thres}}},{t_{i} \in \left\lbrack {{t_{c} - {\Delta \; T_{1}}},t_{c}} \right\rbrack}} \right\} \right)}{n_{1}}} & (1) \end{matrix}$

where the numerator is the number of occurrences that the speed difference between the two sensors is less than a threshold value, ΔV_(thres), the denominator is the number of time stamps in the moving window, tc is a current time stamp, and ΔT₁ is the interval of the moving window. The condition that this metric must satisfy for a GNSS signal to be valid is:

M ₁(t _(c))≧p ₁   (2)

where p1 is a constant threshold value which is not greater than 1.

Second Metric:

The second metric, M2, compares the changes of the heading angle from the GNSS and that derived from yaw rate sensor signals. This comparison is to be made for all combinations of time pairs within a moving time window. This time window is similar to the one in the first metric, but its window size may be different. This metric accounts for two characteristics: 1) overall heading change (i.e., final offset) and 2) fluctuations (i.e., smoothness).

The GNSS heading change between two time points is calculated by either:

$\begin{matrix} {{\Delta\psi}_{GNSS}^{i,j} = {\tan^{- 1}\left( \frac{E_{j} - E_{i}}{N_{j} - N_{i}} \right)}} & (3) \end{matrix}$

for geographic coordinates, where λ is latitude and φ is longitude for the geographic coordinate system, and i and j are the indices of two time stamps in the current moving window, i.e., (t_(i),t_(j))∈[t_(c)−ΔT₂, t_(c)],t_(i)<t_(j)

where ΔT₂ is the size of the moving window.

Or, on the other hand, a heading change can be calculated by integrating the yaw rate using the trapezoid rule:

$\begin{matrix} {{\Delta\psi}_{CAN}^{i,j} = {\sum\limits_{k = {i + 1}}^{j}\left( {\frac{\left( {r_{k - 1} + r_{k}} \right)}{2}\Delta \; t_{k}} \right)}} & (4) \end{matrix}$

where rk is the yaw rate at t=tk, and Δt_(k)=t_(k)−t_(k-1).

As a result, the second metric is defined by:

$\begin{matrix} {{M_{2}\left( t_{c} \right)} = {\sum\limits_{{\forall{({i,j})}}{i < j}}^{\;}{{{\Delta\psi}_{GNSS}^{i,j} - {\Delta\psi}_{CAN}^{i,j}}}}} & (5) \end{matrix}$

and for a valid GNSS signal,

M ₂(t _(c))<p ₂   (7)

where p2 is an angular threshold representing a maximum allowable value for the sum of the absolute values of the heading change differences.

Third Metric:

The third metric, M3, evaluates the positional stability of GNSS data by comparing the curvature of the GNSS trajectory and a derived trajectory from the speed and yaw rate sensors on the vehicle.

The GNSS curvature at time ti is approximated by using heading angles and speeds from two consecutive time stamps:

C _(GNSS) ^(i 1,i) =ΔH _(GNSS) ^(i 1,i) /L _(GNSS) ^(i 1,i)   (8)

where C_(GNSS) ^(i) is the curvature of the GNSS trajectory, ΔH_(GNSS) ^(i-1,i) is the heading change defined by:

$\begin{matrix} {{\Delta \; H_{GNSS}^{{i - 1},i}} = {H_{GNSS}^{i} - H_{GNSS}^{i - 1}}} & (9) \\ {where} & \; \\ {{H_{GNSS}^{i} = {\tan^{- 1}\left( \frac{E_{GNSS}^{i} - E_{GNSS}^{i - 1}}{H_{GNSS}^{i} - H_{GNSS}^{i - 1}} \right)}},} & (10) \end{matrix}$

and L_(GNSS) ^(i-1,i) is the distance traveled in [t_(i-1),t_(i)], or

L _(GNSS) ^(i-1,i) V _(GNSS) ^(i-1)·(t _(i) −t _(i-1))   (11)

Applying the above calculations to each time stamp in a target moving window ΔT₃ we can find the average GNSS curvature at the current time for that moving window, i.e.,

$\begin{matrix} {{{\overset{\_}{c}}_{GNSS}\left( t_{c} \right)} = \frac{\sum\limits_{k = 3}^{n_{3}}c_{GNSS}^{{k - 1},k}}{n_{3} - 2}} & (12) \end{matrix}$

On the other hand, another curvature derived from the vehicle sensors is calculated as follows:

$\begin{matrix} {{{\overset{\_}{c}}_{CAN}\left( t_{c} \right)} = \frac{\sum\limits_{k = 2}^{n_{3}}\left( {r_{k - 1} + r_{k}} \right)}{\sum\limits_{k = 2}^{n_{3}}\left( {V_{CAN}^{k - 1} + V_{CAN}^{k}} \right)}} & (13) \end{matrix}$

Consequently, the third metric and condition for a valid GNSS signal are described as

$\begin{matrix} {{M_{3}\left( t_{c} \right)} = {{\frac{{{\overset{\_}{c}}_{GNSS}\left( t_{c} \right)} - {{\overset{\_}{c}}_{CAN}\left( t_{c} \right)}}{{\overset{\_}{c}}_{CAN}\left( t_{c} \right)}} < p_{3}}} & (14) \end{matrix}$

where p3 is a threshold for this metric.

Fourth Metric:

The fourth metric also considers positional stability, but is used only if the third metric fails to satisfy its validity condition. It calculates a lateral offset created between the two trajectories in the same moving window for the third metric.

Using the GNSS data, the lateral displacement is calculated by

y _(GNSS)(t _(c))=x _(GNSS) sin(Δψ_(GNSS)/2)   (15)

where x_(GNSS) and y_(GNSS) are the longitudinal and lateral displacements, respectively, and Δψ_(GNSS) is the heading change between the first and last time stamps of the moving time window.

On the other hand, it is calculated using the vehicle sensors by the following equations:

$\begin{matrix} {{y_{CAN}\left( t_{c} \right)} = {\sum\limits_{k = 2}^{n_{3}}\left( {\frac{\left( {V_{CAN}^{k - 1} + V_{CAN}^{k}} \right)}{\left( {r_{CAN}^{k - 1} + r_{CAN}^{k}} \right)}\left( {1 - {\cos \left( \frac{r_{CAN}^{k - 1} + r_{CAN}^{k}}{2} \right)}} \right)} \right)}} & (16) \end{matrix}$

The offset between these is used as the fourth metric:

$\begin{matrix} {M_{4} = {{\frac{{y_{GNSS}\left( t_{c} \right)} - {y_{CAN}\left( t_{c} \right)}}{y_{CAN}\left( t_{c} \right)}} < p_{4}}} & (17) \end{matrix}$

where p4 is a threshold that this metric must satisfy for a GNSS signal to be considered valid.

Implementation of the GNSS Quality Filter

The overall GNSS quality assessment system operates as depicted in FIG. 57. Each metric is evaluated sequentially where if the corresponding condition fails a GNSS signal is considered invalid except for the third metric: If the third metric does not satisfy the condition, the fourth metric is evaluated. This is just one implementation model example, but it can be any combination.

An example situation where this system is useful is driving in a city in which GNSS signals may be corrupted occasionally due to the multipath effect that occurs in the urban canyon. In such a situation, it is important to be able to accept a GNSS signal when it is valid and discard otherwise. FIG. 58 shows a schematic of a prototype in which an existing positioning system in the V2X system is augmented by the methodology explained above. The current invention denoted by * serves as a quality filter for V2X applications to reduce the numbers of false positives and negatives.

Basically, we want to make sure that we do not get erroneous results or get overconfident on some results, by reducing the numbers of false positives and negatives. So, the reliability of result and confidence on system go up together, and we can view the problem and double-check the results in at least 3 ways, with a 4^(th) way, as a backup for verification of the 3^(rd) method.

This is very important, as any false positives and negatives, with the cars in the road, could be fatal or very expensive, in terms of human well-being and properties. On the other hand, any correction and verification can save lives and properties or reduce damages drastically. In addition, it can supplement the human judgements and response, to correct or reduce the errors, to avoid accidents, as a preventive measure for human driver.

This is based on expectation and prediction of a behavior for a vehicle or the trajectory, to conclude from observations what it should be or do at a given moment. Any help from mathematical modeling of the situation and environment would be useful for the driver, or for autonomous car. This is especially true, when we look at many cars or many drivers, as the chance of accident with or without the driver is usually high at any given moment for some car in the city. The following figures give more details and components of the system.

As one embodiment, for one example, based on FIG. 57, we have: A method for positioning quality filter for a global navigation system for a vehicle, said method comprising: a central computer receiving global positioning system location data; said central computer receiving sensors data from vehicle sensors; said central computer calculating a first metric value; a processor receiving a first threshold; said processor comparing said first metric value with said first threshold; in case said first metric value is smaller than said first threshold, said processor setting a global navigation system value as invalid; in case said first metric value is larger than or equal to said first threshold, said processor receiving a second threshold; said central computer calculating a second metric value; said processor comparing said second metric value with said second threshold; in case said second metric value is larger than or equal to said second threshold, said processor setting said global navigation system value as invalid; in case said second metric value is smaller than said second threshold, said processor receiving a third threshold; said central computer calculating a third metric value; said processor comparing said third metric value with said third threshold; in case said third metric value is smaller than said third threshold, said processor setting said global navigation system value as valid; in case said third metric value is larger than or equal to said third threshold, said processor receiving a fourth threshold; said central computer calculating a fourth metric value; said processor comparing said fourth metric value with said fourth threshold; in case said fourth metric value is smaller than said fourth threshold, said processor setting said global navigation system value as valid; in case said fourth metric value is larger than or equal to said fourth threshold, said processor setting said global navigation system value as invalid; said central computer validating said global positioning system location data using said global navigation system value, for safety, operation, or navigation of said vehicle.

As other embodiments, we have the following choices or options:

wherein said first threshold is not greater than 1.

getting data for said vehicle speed.

getting data for said vehicle direction.

getting data for said vehicle yaw rate.

correcting said vehicle's direction.

warning an operator.

warning an driver.

warning headquarters.

warning a central server.

warning another driver.

warning another car.

communicating with pedestrians.

communicating with cloud.

communicating with server farms.

communicating with police.

communicating with a grid.

communicating with a secured network.

communicating with outside car sensors.

resolving conflict between sensors and/or received data.

Here are the components and their variations for the invention, for the system and method for positioning quality filter for the V2X technologies: FIG. 57 is for one embodiment of the invention, for a flow chart of the method. FIG. 58 is for one embodiment of the invention, for a flow chart of the method. FIG. 59 is for one embodiment of the invention, for a system for filter for V2X technology. FIG. 60 is for one embodiment of the invention, for a system for filter for V2X technology. FIG. 61 is for one embodiment of the invention, for a system for filter for V2X technology. FIG. 62 is for one embodiment of the invention, for a system for filter for V2X technology. FIG. 63 is for one embodiment of the invention, for a system for filter for V2X technology. FIG. 64 is for one embodiment of the invention, for a system for filter for V2X technology. FIG. 65 is for one embodiment of the invention, for a system for filter for V2X technology. FIG. 66 is for one embodiment of the invention, for a system for filter for V2X technology.

From Prior Teachings:

The teachings of the parent cases, “Methods of tracking pedestrian heading angle using smart phones data for pedestrian safety applications” and “System and method for creating, storing, and updating local dynamic MAP database with safety attribute”, are included here, as well:

Here, we describe some of the embodiments of our system and method:

Let's look at the details of one method:

MAP Generation: MAP Generation based on vehicle data, included in Basic Safety Message (BSM) or equivalent message(s).

-   -   a. Listen to all the BSMs transmitted in the given region, and         based on what is the intended region of map, filter out the BSM         data which falls outside this region. The intended region of map         can also be defined adaptively, using the speed profiles data in         each road segment of interest. For example, a high average speed         road segment will require more map coverage than a low average         speed road segment.     -   b. Store location (concise), Heading, Speed, and timestamp of         each of the BSM.         -   If the vehicle provides PH (Path History or trajectory or             breadcrumb trail points) (concise points), check the             accuracy/confidence of the PH points. In case the accuracy             is good (say better than e.g. 0.4 m (or meter)), store them             instead of actual locations reported by the vehicle.             -   For example, from the current location and velocity, we                 can calculate the next point in time, or we can                 extrapolate the next point, based on the last N points.                 For example, one can assume a line or higher order                 curves, or polynomials of degree M, to fit the points in                 the formula and get the coefficients. Once the                 coefficients are known, the next point can be                 extrapolated.             -   For example, the accuracy can be measured from the                 distance of a given point to the line or curve of                 trajectory.             -   For an embodiment, the accuracy threshold is a fixed                 number or distance.             -   For an embodiment, the accuracy threshold is a variable                 number or distance. That can be dependent on the                 velocity of the vehicle. For example, the higher the                 velocity, the higher the threshold, e.g., with a linear                 relationship.         -   Otherwise, use the location details provided by the vehicle             and generate the PH (Concise) points for the vehicle, and             store these values.     -   c. Start generating a Temporary Map, once the stored data has         sufficient number of vehicles, Q (say, e.g., 1000 vehicles), or         for example, length of time for monitoring, T, as a threshold,         e.g., one-week worth of data, to make sure we have enough data         points for our analysis and determination. In one embodiment, we         can use any logical combination of thresholds or conditions on Q         and T, e.g., using AND or OR.

Here are the steps of one embodiment of our method: (see FIG. 27)

Step 1: Generating Lanes: (see FIGS. 18-19)

-   -   Assign equal weights for all the paths at the start, as the         initialization step.     -   Combine the Paths (or parts of paths) which have a separation         distance of lesser than a fraction of a lane width, say, e.g.,         ¼th of the Lane width, or e.g., 0.5 meter, as the threshold for         this step, to indicate that those are in fact the same. The         weight of the resultant path is calculated using the combined         statistic method similar to the one used in Kalman filtering.         -   e.g., Resultant Weight:

(w_r) =  = 1/sqrt[((1/w 1)² * (1/w 2)²)/((1/w 1)² + (1/w 2)²)]

-   -   Where sqrt is the square root function, w1 is the weight of the         first path, and w2 is the weight of the second path.     -   Another method is to use the first order statistical         combination. Then, we have:

w_r=1/(((1/w1)*(1/w2))/((1/w1)+(1/w2)))

-   -   In general, we have as a function (F) of w1 and w2:

w_r=F(w1, w2)

-   -   First, combine the paths which start and end with the same         heading angles.     -   Second, combine the parts of paths of the vehicles which have         the same headings in that part.     -   For the combined paths which are headed in the same direction,         update the weights (using the above formula) of the paths (or         parts of the paths).     -   Detect Lane changes in the captured/stored data, and discard         that data (either part or full info from that vehicle).         Different methods of detecting lane changes have been proposed         in previous inventions (see the parent applications). Any of         those methods can be used here for the detection of lane         changes.     -   In addition, the statistical Median operation can be also used         to filter outliers in positions and paths. It also can help for         the lane change detection.     -   In one embodiment, generally, the outliers may be bad data         points, and cannot be relied on. So, we filter them out. In one         embodiment, assuming the normal distribution, if any data point         is beyond 2 standard deviations, from the peak, it is considered         as the outlier point, and gets discarded.     -   In one embodiment, a vehicle is monitored from its center, as a         point, for tracking purposes.     -   In one embodiment, a vehicle is monitored from the middle front         point and the middle back point, as 2 points, for tracking         purposes. So, for example, if one point (e.g. the front point)         is in one lane and the other point is in another lane, that may         indicate transition between lanes or changing lanes, if the         difference is above a threshold, which is measured with respect         to the distance perpendicular to the lane direction, or with         respect to the angle relative to the lane direction.

Step 2: Determining Intersection Region and Splitting the lanes: (see FIGS. 20-23)

Intersection Diamond region can be identified from the above data in the following ways: (see FIG. 28)

1. Using Speed profiles of the vehicles.

2. Using Heading angles of the vehicles.

3. Using Intersection of Lanes (generated from Vehicle Travel paths).

Now, let's look at different methods in details:

Method 1: Using Speed Profiles of the vehicles: (see FIGS. 20-22)

-   -   For each of the lanes, consider the stop location of all the         vehicles traversing on that lane.     -   Of these locations, discard the locations where the vehicle         stays for lesser than a short time period t₁, say e.g. 5 sec.         (As these could have been recorded due to vehicle slow motion,         and would not have the time for GPS stabilization. So, they         should be discarded.)     -   Of all these locations, using statistical methods, e.g. using         standard-deviation method, neglect the outliers (e.g. 5%         outliers), or e.g., discard the tail of the probability         distribution on either side, as e.g., extreme cases or         unreliable cases.     -   Consider vehicle travel direction on the road (based on         locations and timestamps), and pick up the location which comes         farthest and toward the exiting end of the lane, as P_(far).     -   Pick up all the locations which lay within distance L₂ of         P_(far), say e.g. within 7 m of the selected location, or A₃.         Calculate the percentage of vehicles in this circle or region.         If the percentage of vehicles in this circle or region is below         S₁, say e.g. 7% of the total vehicle locations on this lane,         then discard the selected location and reconsider above step for         selecting a location.     -   If Vehicle lengths are known, use them, as L₃, else use         L_(default), e.g. 5 m, as typical length, and then calculate the         average of vehicle lengths. (We can eliminate this step and use         5 m, directly, if required, or if not enough data is available         from the vehicles.)     -   Construct average of locations based on average of GPS location         of all vehicles which fall within area A₃, or the 7 m radius of         the selected location.     -   Calculate the GPS location of the point which falls ahead of the         above average-of-locations, at a distance of a fraction of the         typical vehicle length, or S₂, e.g. half (or 55 percent) of         average vehicle length.     -   The GPS location of each of the lanes, constructed based on the         above steps, provides the outer edge of the Intersection Diamond         region.

This applies on other road segment of interest, that show queue of vehicles stopped, with profile history of coming to stop. Another way to look at it is to detect an area where there is no stopped vehicle position density. (This is the intersection diamond region.)

Method 2: Using Heading angles:

-   -   Consider all the vehicles which are traversing on each of the         lanes.     -   Of the vehicles traversing on each lane, select the vehicles         which have executed a change in the Heading angle (by more than         α₁, e.g. 20°), where some of the other vehicles near to that         location were traveling straight.     -   Of all the above selected vehicles, select the location where         they executed this change.     -   Of all these locations, discard the outliers which fall outside         of e.g. 5% of the statistical limit, or tail of the distribution         curve, as anomalies or outliers.     -   Calculate the average of these remaining locations. This average         location provides the lane boundary of the selected lane.         -   In one embodiment, the average is based on average of X and             Y coordinates, on 2-D coordinates.         -   In one embodiment, the average is based on weighted average             of X and Y coordinates, emphasizing some data over the             others. For example, one can have more weights for more             reliable data.     -   The GPS location of each of the lanes, constructed based on the         above steps, provides the outer edge of the Intersection Diamond         region.

Method 3: Using Intersection of Lanes (generated from Vehicle Travel paths): (see FIG. 23)

-   -   For each of the lanes which differ in heading angle by more than         angle α₃, say e.g. 30°, construct the Intersection point of the         lines (lanes).         -   In one embodiment, angle α₃ can be adjusted based on             historical data, as a threshold value.         -   In one embodiment, angle α₃ can be randomly selected from             the range of 25° to 35°.     -   Construct a convex polygon using these points (or a subset of         them) which can cover all the points.         -   In one embodiment, for a subset of points, choose every             other point.         -   In one embodiment, for a subset of points, choose one point             out of every 3 points.         -   In one embodiment, for a subset of points, choose one point             out of every N points. (N is an integer above 3.)         -   In one embodiment, to define a convex polygon using these             points, we look at the current side and 2 previous sides of             the polygon, labeled P₁, P₂, and P₃, respectively, as             vectors. The difference between the directions of vectors             (P₁ and P₂) and (P₂ and P₃) are angles α₄ and α₅,             respectively. If both angles α₄ and α₅ are in the same             directions (e.g. both tilted clockwise, with respect to the             previous vector), then the resulting polygon is a convex             one.     -   Expand the Convex polygon by adding a certain amount of width,         e.g. a fraction (g₁) of the lane width (say e.g. half of the         lane width) on each of the sides.     -   Split the lanes, based on the intersection region polygon.

Step 3: Determining Lane type (Ingress/Egress): (see FIG. 24)

We use the following methods:

Method 1: Using difference in angle in Vehicle heading and Lane-Heading (Waypoint0):

-   -   For each of the lanes, calculate the angle of Waypoint0 (w.r.t.         Waypoint1).     -   Calculate the difference in heading of Waypoint0 and Heading of         vehicle (α₆).     -   If the Difference α₆ falls between say, e.g., {[0°-90°] U         [270°-360°]}, as the union of sets or ranges of angles (or the         angle locating in the union of the first and fourth quadrants in         the 2-D coordinate system), then given lane is an Egress lane,         else (otherwise), it is an Ingress lane.     -   Based on the vehicles heading angle at the 1st waypoint (closest         to intersection region), we decide on whether the Lane is an         Ingress or Egress.

Method 2: Based on vehicle movement inside the Lane:

-   -   Using the location of vehicle and its corresponding time-stamp,         determine whether Vehicle is approaching Waypoint0, or leaving.

Step 4: Determining Approach Set for each of the lanes: (see FIG. 25)

-   -   Combine the (incoming/outgoing) lanes which fall on one side of         the polygon and have either same (or) exactly opposite heading         angle (diff. approximately)180°.

Step 5: Determining connected Lanes: (see FIG. 26)

-   -   For each of the Ingress lanes, observe the movement (mapping of         incoming lanes to outgoing lanes) of each of the vehicles in         that lane.     -   Create a Mapping list for the selected Ingress lane, and count         the vehicles traversing each of these connections.     -   Discard the outliers (connections) where the vehicles traverse         less than e.g. 5% of the total vehicles in that lane.     -   Using relative heading angle between the Ingress lane and         Connecting-Egress lane (α₇), determine whether a         Left/Right/Straight (L/R/S) maneuver is required to enter the         connecting-Egress lane.         -   In one embodiment, we compare the angle α₇ with a threshold             angle α₈. If absolute value of α₇ is smaller than or equal             to α₈, then we call it Straight. If absolute value of α₇ is             bigger than α₈, then, e.g.:             -   For positive α₇ values, we call it Right.             -   For negative α₇ values, we call it Left.

Step 6: Determining Movement states for each Ingress lane:

-   -   For each of the Ingress lanes, based on the Connected-Egress         lane's Maneuver code, determine the Movement state. Say, for         example, the possible connection maneuvers are Left-Turn (LT),         Straight (S), and then the Movement states are: LT movement, S         movement.

MAP Generation: Improvement to above described method in steps 1-6 with an additional Signal Data available from Traffic controller. (see FIG. 40)

The Idea in this method is to match Traffic controller's signal-phase data with vehicles' motion in each of the lanes and determine the signal phase for each of the Lane/Approach. Here is how it works:

-   -   Continuously poll Traffic-controller for the Signal status         information.     -   When Traffic-controller is stating a particular phase number for         the first time, during next short period of time, t₂, e.g. 1-5         seconds, identify the lanes in which vehicles started moving         from a halt.     -   Of these lanes, identify the direction of travel of the vehicles         in each ingress lane towards their egress lanes, and determine         the Phase-number for that lane corresponding to that Movement         state.     -   For each of the Signal-phase mapped to the Ingress lane, count         the number of vehicles using that phase to cross the Diamond         region, N₁.     -   Eliminate the Outlier, e.g. 5% of the phases (if any), or the         tail of the distribution, from the above list of phases for each         of the Ingress lanes, resulting in a smaller number (N₂).

MAP Maintenance: Based on BSM messages(s) or equivalent vehicle message. (see FIG. 40)

-   -   Removal of (or repair work in) a Lane: When the density of the         vehicles in a particular lane drops off drastically (e.g., more         than a percentage or ratio of the original number, e.g., more         than N₃ percentage), and adjoining lane increases in a similar         manner (e.g., more than a percentage or ratio of the original         number, e.g., more than N₄ percentage).         -   A vehicle breakdown is detected in that lane. (Or)         -   The lane is temporarily closed. (Or)         -   The lane is permanently closed. (Or)         -   A detour is assigned for that lane. (Or)         -   There is an accident in that lane. (Or)         -   Almost all the vehicles in that lane have been detected to             do a lane change to adjacent lane(s) before a certain point             (coordinates X, Y in 2D space). (Or)         -   No vehicles were detected in that lane over a period of             time, t₃, e.g. 2 hours, while on a similar time frame over a             past couple of days, or N_(past) past number of days, we had             a greater number of vehicles using that lane,             percentage-wise with respect to all vehicles on the road, or             using an absolute number, e.g., N_(abs), e.g. 50.             -   The exception is for holidays and weekends, which have                 different traffic patterns. So, we do not include them                 for comparison with weekdays. So, for comparison, we                 have different classes, e.g.: working day class, weekend                 class, and holiday class, which correspond to different                 days and traffic patterns and human behaviors.             -   For example, during weekends, at 6 am, the lanes may be                 empty or almost empty, but there is no accident or                 broken down car in any lane. So, it cannot be compared                 with a period of rush-hour at 6 am during weekdays/work                 days. So, each class should be compared within/with                 itself.             -   For example, during different seasons, e.g. winter, the                 ice and snow may slow down the cars. Thus, those days                 cannot be good base of comparison for a sunny day in                 Summer. So, they constitute a new class of days with                 different traffic patterns and behavior. So, they should                 be compared with similar days with similar                 situations/classes.     -   Removal of (or repair work in) an Approach: When, e.g., the         density of the vehicles in a particular approach road decreases.         -   For example, a major pileup (breakdown in multiple/all             lanes) has been detected.         -   For example, the road is closed and a detour is assigned.         -   No vehicles were detected in that lane over a period of             time, while the same time previous days had a considerable             number of vehicles passing through that approach.             -   One can specify the previous number of days, N.             -   One can specify the number of hours or window of hours,                 e.g., from 12:00 to 16:00, or from 12 noon to 4 pm, for                 monitoring the traffic.             -   One can specify the considerable number of vehicles (as                 a threshold), or number of cars in general, as the                 absolute number or ratio of numbers or percentage of                 total, e.g., 50 cars, or 50 cars/hour, or 5 times more                 cars than yesterday for the same time period, or 50                 percent more cars than yesterday for the same window of                 time or rush hours, or 1.2 times more cars than 2 hours                 ago, or 50 more cars than 2 hours ago, or 50 cars/minute                 more cars than 2 hours ago (as the rate comparison), or                 50 percent more cars/minute than 2 hours ago (as the                 rate comparison), or 1.2 times more cars/minute than 2                 hours ago (as the rate comparison).             -   The season, holidays, weekends, weather-related events,                 and work days are considered, to define different                 classes of the days, hours, traffic patterns, or human                 bahaviors, for comparison purposes, as the base line, or                 find anomaly, or find road condition, or determine                 traffic status, or prepare maps, or modify maps.             -   Historical data can be accumulated for a region or                 specific road to get the patterns for traffic or                 behavior, e.g., to predict the future or scale the                 results or numbers for a specific condition. For                 example, for rainy days, the speeds are reduced by a                 factor of 30 percent.             -   For different roads, one can define different classes,                 for which the same pattern is observed, or there is a                 common parameter or property. For example, the 4-lane                 interstate highways, near a major city, may show a                 similar traffic pattern or traffic jams, or they may                 have same general traffic speed. So, we define a class                 for these highways, which historically or statistically                 behave similarly, in one or more aspects or parameters.                 Then, for a given class member, if we get a data for a                 specific time/day, e.g., for speed of vehicles, and                 e.g., it shows 20 percent lower speed with respect to 1                 hour ago, then one can assume the same for other members                 of the same class for the same time period, which is                 useful to estimate the speed for other highways, or make                 the data analysis faster, even if we have no data or                 incomplete data from other members of class (other                 highways of the same class), which probably gives us a                 reasonable starting point or base line or data point,                 especially in the absence of data or reliable data from                 other highways of the same class.     -   Updating Waypoints of a Lane: When vehicle-Matching is either         continuously failing or having a correction values above e.g. 20         cm, or a threshold distance, D. Note that D can be defined based         on a fraction of lane width or average car length, or percentage         or ratio of those parameters.         -   Do a Lane-matching for all the vehicles traversing in the             Mapped region.         -   For each of the Lane, calculate the average lateral-offset             values each of the vehicles is having in each segment of the             Lane.         -   If the lateral offsets are greater than, D_(w), e.g. 20 cm,             for particular contiguous waypoints, add additional             waypoints in between the existing waypoints, based on             average location or X-Y 2D coordinates (discarding outliers,             e.g. 5 percent outliers, anomalies, or tails of distribution             curve) of recent-vehicles traversing in that lane-segment,             e.g. recent 15 minutes or 1 hour.             -   In one embodiment, D_(w) is defined e.g. based on lane                 width or average vehicle length or width.

MAP Maintenance: Improvement to above method with additional Signal Data available from Traffic Controller. (see FIG. 40)

-   -   Keep a continuous monitor on the Vehicle traversals using each         of the Signal phases.     -   Verify if the existing Matching of the Signal-Phases and the         Vehicle motions in each of the active lanes are still valid.     -   Neglect the outlier in the matching, e.g. the 5 percent         extremes, but if the matching provides a consistent         “inconsistencies” in the matchings, update the Signal-Phase and         Lane-Movement states matching.

MAP publishing, storing, and updating mechanisms: Broadcasting MAP information. (see FIG. 40)

Each of the RSE/Remote-Server would have 2 MAPS for each location, namely, Base-Map and Look-aside (Current-status) MAP.

Case 1: No Base map is available (initial condition):

-   -   For a Look-aside MAP, once the MAP has sufficient number of         vehicle (say e.g. 100) traversals on each of its lanes, consider         it for further calculations.     -   Once the above limit is reached, execute a Map-matching of         vehicles with Look-aside MAP, and determine the match percentage         or ratio. Average the matching percentage for all the vehicles.     -   If the Match-percentage is high (say e.g. above 99%), upgrade         the Look-aside database at that instant to Base-MAP.

Case 2: Base Map is available (updating condition):

-   -   Compare the Base Map with Look-aside MAP for following         differences:         -   Lateral distance shifts in the Waypoints of the lane: Ignore             them if the shift is less than D_(s), e.g. 20 cm, or a             threshold distance.             -   In one embodiment, D_(s) is defined e.g. based on lane                 width or average vehicle length or width, or based on                 D_(w). For example, D_(s) is set equal to D_(w).             -   In one embodiment, D_(s) is adjusted based on historical                 data, or corrected by human expert periodically.         -   Connection lane changes: Changes in possible maneuver codes             of the lane and the connected lane lists.         -   Change in Signal-Phase matching.     -   In case the changes in the Base-Map and Look-aside Map are         considerable (above a threshold), and base Map is failing to         provide high-Map-matching results, while Look-aside MAP is able         to provide high MAP-Matching results, consider upgrading         Look-aside MAP in the following criteria:         -   Manual override is detected for upgrading existing             Look-aside MAP.         -   The difference is seen consistently for more than e.g. a             Day, or a specific time period Tc, and there are sufficient             numbers of vehicles, N_(v) (say e.g. 1000), in each of the             lanes, for proper statistics and analysis. Cherry pick these             differences and update them in Base-Map.             Decreasing Computations and increasing confidence in             MAP-Generations: (see FIG. 40)

Some minimal information, when available, could be manually fed to the system allowing the system to identify vehicle movements accurately and generate better results, in a shorter time period. For example:

-   -   Approach Count, and Approach names     -   Lane numbers in each Approach and Lane-widths     -   Cross-Walks     -   Traffic controller-information (to which system to poll and get         results)     -   Approximate intersection-Diamond region dimensions, or         average/typical of those dimensions from other locations

Safety Consideration:

Detecting an idle vehicle (or Breakdown vehicle or accident vehicle or a closed lane) and share the location of this vehicle with other vehicles make this concept of map extend, to have a safety attribute.

FIG. 18 is for one embodiment of the invention, for step 1, generating lanes. FIG. 19 is for one embodiment of the invention, for step 1, generating lanes. FIG. 20 is for one embodiment of the invention, for step 2, constructing INTX Diamond Region. FIG. 21 is for one embodiment of the invention, for step 2, constructing INTX Diamond Region. FIG. 22 is for one embodiment of the invention, for step 2, constructing INTX Diamond Region. FIG. 23 is for one embodiment of the invention, for Method 3, using lane intersections. FIG. 24 is for one embodiment of the invention, for step 3, determining lane type. FIG. 25 is for one embodiment of the invention, for step 4, determining approach set.

FIG. 26 is for one embodiment of the invention, for step 5, determining connection set. FIG. 27 is for one embodiment of the invention, for a system of creating, storing, and updating local dynamic MAP database with safety attribute. FIG. 28 is for one embodiment of the invention, for a system of creating, storing, and updating local dynamic MAP database with safety attribute.

FIG. 29 is for one embodiment of the invention, for a system of map generation. It generates maps using vehicle data such as location, speed, and heading, along with time stamp. It identifies map region using speed profile data collected on each road segment. It builds path history for each vehicle data. It generates temporary map when enough data is captured.

FIG. 30 is for one embodiment of the invention, for a system of lane generation. It constructs lanes by clustering vehicles path and combining vehicle paths inside the clusters. It clusters vehicle paths using separation distance. It combines vehicle path using statistical weighting method. It combines vehicle path using heading angle data. It filters the data that belongs to lane change event.

FIG. 31 is for one embodiment of the invention, for a system of determining intersection and lanes splitting. It determines intersection region using vehicles speed profiles, vehicles heading angles, and vehicles travel path intersects. It detects when and where vehicles have stopped. Stopped vehicles locations are correlated with the lanes exit lines. It detects vehicle locations where significant change in the heading has occurred. It identifies intersection region of moving vehicle paths with significant heading angle difference approach. It constructs convex polygon. It splits lane using the polygon region.

FIG. 32 is for one embodiment of the invention, for a system of determining Lane type (Ingress/Egress). It determines “Ingress/Egress” lane type using correlation between vehicle heading and lane heading, and vehicle motion inside the lane.

FIG. 33 is for one embodiment of the invention, for a system of determining the approach set for every lane. It determines the approach set for every lane by combining the incoming and outgoing lanes that fall on one side of the polygon and have similar or opposite heading angle.

FIG. 34 is for one embodiment of the invention, for a system of determining connecting lanes and movement state for ingress lane. It determines connected lanes by observing vehicles motion along ingress and egress lane. It determines the maneuver type to go between ingress and egress (left/right/straight).

FIG. 35 is for one embodiment of the invention, for a system of MAP Generation. Improved map generation uses signal data available from traffic controller. It correlates the traffic controller signal phase data with the vehicle motion status (e.g., as: “is going to stop”, “has stopped”, “is moving from stop”, “moving”, and etc.).

FIG. 36 is for one embodiment of the invention, for a system of Map maintenance. Abnormal traffic condition is detected by observing the vehicle density profile and the vehicle path matching performance. Different types of conditions that cause the abnormality are detected, such as idle vehicle, accident, work zone, or even a permanent or temporary change in the road.

FIG. 37 is for one embodiment of the invention, for a system of Map maintenance. Improved map maintenance uses signal data from traffic controller. It verifies that existing matching between vehicle motion and signal phase data for each lane is still the same.

FIG. 38 is for one embodiment of the invention, for a system of Map publishing, storing, and updating mechanism. Two maps are stored: base map and look aside map. At initialization, no base map is available. Look aside map can be moved to base map when enough confidence is built. The look aside replaces the corresponding part of the base map when its confidence level becomes better than the base map.

FIG. 39 is for one embodiment of the invention, for a system of Safety Consideration. It detects an idle vehicle (breakdown vehicle) and shares the location of this vehicle with other vehicles, for map, to have a safety attribute.

An embodiment of the invention is a method for creating, storing, and updating local dynamic map database with safety attribute, for a street or highway, said method comprising: a central computer receiving speed profiles from vehicles in said street or highway from an input device; an analyzer module or device determining vehicular density for said vehicles in said street or highway; an identifier module or device determining lane attributes for a lane in said street or highway; receiving traffic controller data for said street or highway; integrating said traffic controller data for said street or highway into map data; identifying temporary and permanent changes in said map data; updating said map data; and identifying an obstacle of mobility attribute in said map data.

An embodiment of the invention is one of the following:

-   -   identifying intersections for said street or highway.     -   identifying an idle vehicle in said street or highway.     -   identifying an accident in said street or highway.     -   using a short range communication device.     -   using an on-board device in a car.     -   using a road side equipment.     -   determining a status of said traffic controller data.     -   determining a correlation with a status of said traffic         controller data.     -   storing said map data.     -   generating a basic safety message.     -   storing location, heading, and speed of a car.     -   storing a time-stamp for a basic safety message.     -   checking an accuracy of past history points.     -   generating lanes for said street or highway.     -   combining paths for said street or highway.     -   using statistical analysis for paths.     -   using weights for paths.     -   detecting a lane change event.     -   filtering outlier samples in statistical analysis.

In one embodiment, the map can be generated in a central processor. In one embodiment, the map can be generated in distributed processors, and later merged together as one map. The advantage of the distributed-processors method is that if for any reason the communication or the processing is interrupted, the other processors can partially supply the data for the vehicles, for navigation and operation. In one embodiment, the processor is mobile itself, e.g., installed in a car, satellite, drone, balloon, or airplane. In one embodiment, the processor is stationary, at a fixed location. In one embodiment, the processor network manages the map, e.g., in a server farm.

In one embodiment, each server covers one part of the city or area. In one embodiment, the geographical areas have overlaps for coverage. In one embodiment, there are redundancies between coverage of different units. In one embodiment, there is a correction based on the redundancies between coverage of different units, to find and filter out the erroneous data. In one embodiment, there is an averaging process based on the redundancies between coverage of different units, to average the data for more accurate results. In one embodiment, there is a weighted-averaging process based on the redundancies between coverage of different units, to weighted-average the data for more accurate results, with more weights for the more reliable units or sources, or higher weights for the results that are closer to the center of curve representing the distribution of values, i.e., eliminating or reducing the fringe results or erroneous data.

In one embodiment, we have data distributed and sold to a third party subscribing to our service and data flow, as updates and feed, so that they can manage the traffic or control cars or analyze the data for marketing purposes or finding the trends. For example, from the traffic patterns, one can conclude that how many cars are going to the new mall or store and how long they stay at that mall in average, in terms of hours, and at what hours or which days, which will help the mall to plan for marketing and sales, e.g., to order merchandise in advance for specific people or specific time or season. In addition, from the traffic pattern, one can conclude that which areas or streets are most likely the source of cars to a specific mall or region, statistically, so that from the social or income data from a target neighborhood, one can find the social or income level of people likely going to a specific mall, and at what time during the day, as a probability distribution, so that the average, or median, or aggregate, or expected value, or standard deviation can be extracted or estimated for each parameter under study, e.g., income level or average age or gender, e.g., a stay-home or vacationing parent driving to mall during day time on weekdays (e.g., not working at an office or regular job or vacationing, so that have enough time during the day to go to mall during weekdays and non-holidays). Such estimates and statistics for patterns or behaviors for people are very valuable for marketing and sales people who want to predict and plan ahead. Thus, they buy these data and analyze and extract patterns from them for their specific purposes.

Another purpose or usage for such data is for traffic planning or city expansion planning or metro rail planning for future, e.g., to remove congestion or reduce traffic around main roads or plan for gas stations or malls or office buildings or metro stations or train stations, or estimate the trend for population growth or movement or concentration throughout the years, by comparing such traffic data in time, e.g., to plan schools for future for a district. Aggregate and trend and direction results are very useful and valuable for people in charge or decision makers for all of the private and public sectors. For example, for heavily congested and concentrated intersections and roads, the real estate market and values may go up, due to demand for commercial space and office space. Or, the parking fee rate per hour or per day may go up, due to the demand or shortage for parking space, at least during the time that are the peak for traffic, from our data collected for various times and regions.

Here, we describe some of our embodiments/examples, as components of our system:

Map Generation: (See FIG. 29)

-   -   It generates maps using vehicle data such as location, speed,         and heading, along with time stamp.     -   It identifies map region using speed profile data collected on         each road segment.     -   It builds path history for each vehicle data.     -   It generates temporary map when enough data is captured.

Generating lanes: (See FIG. 30)

-   -   It constructs lanes by clustering vehicles path and combining         vehicle paths inside the clusters.     -   It clusters vehicle paths using separation distance.     -   It combines vehicle path using statistical weighting method.     -   It combines vehicle path using heading angle data.     -   It filters the data that belongs to lane change event.

Determining Intersection and Lanes Splitting: (See FIG. 31)

-   -   It determines intersection region using vehicles speed profiles,         vehicles heading angles, and vehicles travel path intersects.     -   It detects when and where vehicles have stopped.     -   Stopped vehicles locations are correlated with the lanes exit         lines.     -   It detects vehicle locations where significant change in the         heading has occurred.     -   It identifies intersection region of moving vehicle paths with         significant heading angle difference approach.     -   It constructs convex polygon.     -   It splits lane using the polygon region.

Determining Lane type (Ingress/Egress): (See FIG. 32)

-   -   It determines “Ingress/Egress” lane type using correlation         between vehicle heading and lane heading, and vehicle motion         inside the lane.

Determining the Approach Set for Every Lane: (See FIG. 33)

-   -   It determines the approach set for every lane by combining the         incoming and outgoing lanes that fall on one side of the polygon         and have similar or opposite heading angle.

Determining Connecting Lanes and Movement State for Ingress Lane: (See FIG. 34)

-   -   It determines connected lanes by observing vehicles motion along         ingress and egress lane.     -   It determines the maneuver type to go between ingress and egress         (left/right/straight).

More in MAP Generation: (See FIG. 35)

-   -   Improved map generation uses signal data available from traffic         controller.     -   It correlates the traffic controller signal phase data with the         vehicle motion status (e.g., as: “is going to stop”, “has         stopped”, “is moving from stop”, “moving”, and etc.).

Map Maintenance: (See FIG. 36)

-   -   Abnormal traffic condition is detected by observing the vehicle         density profile and the vehicle path matching performance.     -   Different type of conditions that causes the abnormality are         detected, such as idle vehicle, accident, work zone, or even a         permanent or temporary change in the road.

More in Map Maintenance: (See FIG. 37)

-   -   Improved map maintenance uses signal data from traffic         controller.     -   It verifies that existing matching between vehicle motion and         signal phase data for each lane is still the same.

Map Publishing, Storing, and Updating Mechanism: (See FIG. 38)

-   -   Two maps are stored: base map and look aside map.     -   At initialization, no base map is available. Look aside map can         be moved to base map when enough confidence is built.     -   The look aside replaces the corresponding part of the base map         when its confidence level becomes better than the base map.

Safety Consideration: (See FIG. 39)

-   -   It detects an idle vehicle (breakdown vehicle) and shares the         location of this vehicle with other vehicles, for map, to have a         safety attribute.

Description of the Overall System

Here, we describe the overall/general system for some of our embodiments above:

FIGS. 1-9 describe in details the presented automated vehicle system. FIGS. 10-17 explain some embodiments of the current invention. FIG. 1 is for one embodiment, as an example, for representation of development of fully automated vehicles, in stages, for progression toward fully automated vehicles. FIG. 2 is for one embodiment of the invention, for a system for automated vehicles, using GPS, independent sensors, maps, driving dynamics, and sensor fusions and integrations.

FIG. 3 is for one embodiment of the invention, for a system for automated vehicles, with different measurement devices, e.g., LIDAR (using laser, scanner/optics, photodetectors/sensors, and GPS/position/navigation systems, for measuring the distances, based on travel time for light), radar, GPS, traffic data, sensors data, or video, to measure or find positions, coordinates, and distances. The government agencies may impose restrictions on security and encryption of the communications and data for modules and devices within the system, as the minimum requirements, as the hackers or terrorists may try to get into the system and control the vehicles for a destructive purpose. Thus, all of the components are based on those requirements imposed by the US or other foreign governments, to comply with the public safety.

FIG. 4 is for one embodiment of the invention, for automated vehicle functional architecture, for sensing, perception, applications, and actuation. FIG. 5 is for one embodiment of the invention, for automated vehicle infrastructure architecture, for sensing, gateway, and services.

FIG. 6 is for one embodiment of the invention, for a system for V2X landscape, with components, for spectrum and range of frequencies and communications, for various technologies, for various purposes, for different ranges. FIG. 7 is for one embodiment of the invention, for a system for framework for V2I applications, with components, for road-side platform and on-board platform, using various messages and sensors.

FIG. 8 is for one embodiment of the invention, for a system for automated vehicle command and control (C2) cloud, with components, with various groups and people involved, as user, beneficiary, or administrator. FIG. 9 is for one embodiment of the invention, for a system for our (Savari) C2 network, with components, showing communications between networks and vehicles, using traffic centers' data and regulations by different government agencies.

In one embodiment, we have the following technical components for the system: vehicle, roadway, communications, architecture, cybersecurity, safety reliability, human factors, and operations. In one embodiment, we have the following non-technical analysis for the system: public policy, market evolution, legal/liability, consumer acceptance, cost-benefit analysis, human factors, certification, and licensing.

In one embodiment, we have the following requirements for AV (automated vehicles) system:

Secure reliable connection to the command and control center

Built-in fail-safe mechanisms

Knowledge of its position and map database information (micro and macro maps)

Communication with traffic lights/road side infrastructure

Fast, reliable, and secure

Situational awareness to completely understand its immediate surrounding environment

Requires multiple sensors

Algorithms to analyze information from sensors

Algorithms to control the car, for drive-by-wire capability

In one embodiment, we have the following primary technologies for our system:

V2X communication: time-critical and reliable, secure, cheap, and dedicated wireless spectrum

Car OBE (on-board equipment): sensor integration (vision, radar and ADAS (advanced driver assistance system)), positioning (accurate position, path, local map), wireless module (physical layer (PHY), Media Access Control (MAC), antenna), security (multi-layer architecture), processing and message engine, and algorithms for vehicle prediction and control

In one embodiment, we have the following building blocks for AVs:

Automation Platform

-   -   i. Advanced Driver Assistance (ADAS) integration     -   ii. Map Integration, Lane Control     -   iii. Radio communications support     -   iv. Vehicle Controller Unit to do actuation

Base Station

-   -   Ground positioning support to improve positioning accuracy     -   V2I (vehicle to infrastructure) functionality, support for         public/private spectrums     -   Cloud connectivity to provide secure access to vehicles

Command Control Center

-   -   i. Integration with Infrastructure Providers

Here are some of the modules, components, or objects used or monitored in our system: V2V (vehicle to vehicle), GPS (Global Positioning System), V2I (vehicle to infrastructure), HV (host vehicle), RV (remote vehicle, other vehicle, or 3^(rd) party), and active and passive safety controls.

FIG. 10 is for one embodiment of the invention, for a system for host vehicle, range of R values, region(s) defined, multiple nodes or vehicles inside and outside region(s), for communications between networks and vehicles, and warning decisions or filtering purposes, for various filters to reduce computations and reduce the bandwidth needed to handle the message traffic. FIG. 11 is for one embodiment of the invention, for a system for host vehicle, range of R values, region(s) defined, for an irregular shape(s), depending on (x,y) coordinates in 2D (dimensional) coordinates, defining the boundaries, or in 3D for crossing highways in different heights, if connecting.

FIG. 12 is for one embodiment of the invention, for a system for automated vehicles, with components, with one or more filtering modules, based on coordinates, Rs, GPS, and maps, and their corresponding corrections. FIG. 13 is for one embodiment of the invention, for a system for automated vehicles, with components, with a function F( ) e.g., depending on the velocity of the vehicle, for calculations for Lat and Lon coordinates, and their corresponding deltas or differences, with local and global coordinate correction module(s).

FIG. 14 is for one embodiment of the invention, for a method for automated vehicles, for adjusting R dynamically, based on rules engine, historical data, user-interface, or neural network, e.g., for filtering purpose. FIG. 15 is for one embodiment of the invention, for a system for automated vehicles, for filtering module, for direction, velocity, and distance, e.g., using independent sensors and GPS.

FIG. 16 is for one embodiment of the invention, for a system for automated vehicles, for filtering module, for power, power threshold(s), traffic data, maps, topography, R, number of nodes, and rate of change of number of nodes, with a module for updating the new roads, intersections, and topographies, by user or automatically, as a feed, e.g. periodically or based on an event.

FIG. 17 is for one embodiment of the invention, for a system for automated vehicles, for filtering module, for modifying region, for various vehicles, with relative position module and GPS, with condition module, to compare and get all the relevant nodes or vehicles.

Here, we describe a method, as one embodiment: The first level of filtering is based on defining circle (geometry) of interest or any other geometrical shape (see also FIG. 11). For the circular geometry case, the objective is to ignore (not process) all nodes (vehicles) that is outside a calculated radius R (see also FIG. 10). In one embodiment, the R is calculated based on the targeted safety applications combined with vehicle dynamics. For example, FCW (forward collision warning), BSW (blind spot warning), LCA (lane change assist), IMA (intersection movement assist), and CSW can all be implemented using 200 m (meter) radius. In one embodiment, as the vehicle speed decreases, the forward application required coverage range decreases.

In one embodiment, for example, for calculating R, we have (see also FIG. 13):

R, as a function of host vehicle speed, F_(H), e.g.:

R=F _(H)(V)=50+2V+(V ²/8)

Where V is the host vehicle speed in m/s.

In one embodiment, F is a function of velocities, distances, and coordinates, both in absolute values and relative values, for host and other vehicles. In one embodiment, F is a function of polynomial of degree G, in host vehicle speed V. In the example above, we have: G=2.

For example, for: 70 m≦R≦200 m

That is, Maximum (R)=200 m, and

Minimum (R)=70 m.

The 70 meter will still be sufficient to do all the rear applications. These numbers are just examples for some specific applications.

In one embodiment, the next step is to convert this R to delta Longitudinal and delta Latitude from the host vehicle coordinate. The objective here is to ignore all vehicles that are outside a radius. Here, we assumed circular filtering. Different types of geometric filtering can also be done: rectangle, ellipse, other irregular geometry, or any other regions or shapes. For circular filtering, given the current host vehicle (HV) coordinate (lat_HV, lon_HV), and given the desired filtering radius R, then the equivalent delta latitude (Delta lat) and delta longitudinal (Delta_lon), from (lat_HV, lon_HV) for this radius R, are calculated as follows (see also FIG. 13):

Delta_lat=(R/Radius of earth)=(R/6378137),

e.g., based on Earth Equatorial radius of 6378137 m,

and where R is in meter (m).

Delta_lon=arcsin (sin(Delta_lat)/cos(lat_HV))

Therefore, in one embodiment, to apply the filtering algorithm for any node (Remote Vehicle (RV)), with the coordinate of (lat_RV, lon_RV), the following is executed (see also FIG. 13, for Comparison Module and Condition Module):

If

-   -   Abs(lat_RV−lat_HV)>Delta_lat         -   OR     -   Abs(lon_RV−lon_HV)>Delta_lon

Then: Ignore it (i.e., do not process it).

Else: Process it.

Wherein all “lat” and “lon” values are expressed in radian. The default value for R is 200 m, but it is configurable. For jam reduction and reduction of processing, in one embodiment, we want to ignore all the vehicles outside of the radius R.

Now, in one embodiment, this value of R can be adaptively adjusted based on the statistical distribution of the nodes ranges (see also FIG. 12). For example, if the maximum number of nodes that can be processed is 150, and the calculated R=200 m, and the number of nodes in the 200 m radius is 200 nodes, but most of those nodes are close to the 200 m range, then the R value can be adaptively adjusted (reduced), so we get close to the 150 desired total numbers of nodes. For example, this can be done in small steps with AR, in a loop, reducing the value of R slightly, each time (in each step), and measuring the nodes or vehicles within the new radius, and the process continues, until we get 150 nodes or less in that radius, and then we exit the loop, and stop the process (see also FIG. 14). Then, we select the final radius as the radius for the formulation and next steps.

In one embodiment, the second level of filtering is based on the relative velocity between the host vehicle and the remote vehicle. For example, for all remote vehicles that have a value of the velocity component in host vehicle direction that is greater than the host vehicle velocity, and they are also at relatively high range distance from the host vehicle, then they constitute no immediate threat on the host vehicle (based on the probability) (see also FIG. 15). Thus, those vehicles can be filtered out.

In one embodiment, the third level of filtering is to adjust either the transmitted power and/or the received power threshold as a function of one of the following (as different embodiments) (see also FIG. 16):

a. Rate of change in the number of received nodes. As the number of nodes increases sharply, the host vehicle is approaching a congested traffic area, and therefore, the transmitted power can be decreased to reduce the communication range, and/or the received power threshold can be increased to reduce the receiving communication range (see also FIG. 16).

b. The map database can also be used very effectively: For example, if the number of connected road segments to the host vehicle road segment is high, and/or the total number of road segments is high within a defined area, then the transmitted power can be decreased, and/or the received power threshold can be increased (see also FIG. 16).

c. Based on the calculated R. For example, communication range R decreases/increases, as the transmission power increases/decreases (see also FIG. 16).

In one embodiment, the fourth level of filtering is just using the map database: For example, filter all the nodes (vehicles) that are on road segments that are not connected to the host vehicle road segment. An example for that is the main road and an overpass geometry. The main road and the overpass that passes over it are not connected, and thus, they do not make a V2V (vehicle to vehicle) possible traffic hazard. Map database can provide this information that these two road segments are not connected (see also FIG. 16).

The advantages of our methods are very clear over what the current state-of-the-art is. Our methods optimally use the available processing power and available bandwidth on processing the data of the desired nodes, which are relevant or important. They also help reducing the communication congestion problem.

Tracking the Heading Angle of the Pedestrian

Here, we describe embodiments for tracking the heading angle of the pedestrian system and method.

The purpose of this approach is to track the heading angle of the pedestrian using existing sensors integrated in to a smart phone device or other mobile devices, e.g., wearables or smart watches.

The system tries to use the following data when it is available:

-   -   a. GPS-GPS position-GPS speed-GPS heading     -   b. Compass heading     -   c. Three rotation measurements (pitch, yaw, roll)     -   d. Three acceleration measurements (down, longitudinal, lateral)

In general, when a pedestrian is moving, it is an easy task to track its positions, and therefore, its heading. However, when the pedestrian is stopped, but changing his direction, tracking the heading, as his intended direction of travel, becomes a more difficult job. (See FIG. 41.)

High level algorithm:

Step 1:

Calculate heading from GPS position:

ψ_(p)=arcTan(ΔE/ΔN). (arc tan is the tan inverse function)

See FIG. 42.

To see a significance difference in the position from one time epoch to a later one, this equation may apply at a lower data rate.

Step 2:

Based on the heading measurement, ψ_(GPS), and/or the calculated one, ψ_(p), try to best-match the pedestrian walk with the intended intersection segment. This will be the initial high probability candidate (IC1). The second candidate is the one perpendicular to it (IC2). See FIG. 43.

Step 3:

Determine if the pedestrian stopped.

-   -   a. Detect a drop in speed. Watch the speed profile and look for         a drop from a consistent profile. See FIG. 44.     -   b. Look for a centralized cloud of positions. See FIG. 45.     -   c. Watch for increase in longitudinal acceleration (-ve), after         a consistent behavior. See FIG. 46.

At the end of Step 3, the pedestrian stop flag will either be set (value=1) or not changed at all (value=0).

Step 4:

If the stop flag is never set and the position of the pedestrian is within G=2 meter radius from the surveyed edge of the intersection, then IC1 is held as the intended driving path.

Step 5:

If StopFlag=1, then it is important to watch the behavior of the compass heading angle, ψ_(c), before the stop and during the stop. See FIGS. 47 and 48. We are looking to detect a behavior like this.

We are trying to capture a turn maneuver by the pedestrian. Another way of doing it, if yaw rate signal is available, is to watch integration of the yaw rate for a window of T=1-2 sec. See FIGS. 49-50.

Step 6:

Offset the last ψ_(p) and/or ψ_(GPS) (before stop) by the value of Δ_(ψ) _(c) or Δ_(ψ) (call it ψ_(p) corrected). (See above.)

Step 7:

Repeat Step 3 with ψ_(p) corrected.

Step 8:

Once the pedestrian starts walking again, check how the ψ_(p)-corrected is correlated with the new ψ_(p).

FIGS. 51-54 show the embodiments of the systems of this invention.

Here are some examples: A method for safe crossing for pedestrians in a street or highway, said method comprising: a central computer receiving global positioning system location data for a pedestrian during a first time period from a remote location; said central computer calculating an angle for heading and a vector for direction of said pedestrian, using said global positioning system location data for said pedestrian during said first time period; said central computer predicting a first choice candidate for intended intersection segment for said pedestrian to cross, based on said angle for heading and said vector for said direction of said pedestrian; said central computer predicting a second choice candidate for intended intersection segment for said pedestrian to cross, based on said angle for heading and said vector for said direction of said pedestrian; wherein said first choice candidate for intended intersection segment for said pedestrian to cross is perpendicular to said second choice candidate for intended intersection segment for said pedestrian to cross; said central computer monitoring speed profile for said pedestrian.

If said central computer detects a drop from consistent range of said speed profile for said pedestrian, then said central computer determining that said pedestrian is stopping; said central computer determining cluster of positions for said pedestrian at rest status; said central computer monitoring acceleration profile for said pedestrian in 3 different dimensions; if said central computer detects a large negative drop from consistent range of said acceleration profile for said pedestrian, then said central computer determining that said pedestrian is stopping; said central computer receiving a flag value for rest status; said central computer receiving a radius value threshold distance; if said flag value for rest status is not true, and if distance between location of said pedestrian to an edge of an intersection for a street or highway is less than said radius value threshold distance, then said central computer selecting said first choice candidate for intended intersection segment for said pedestrian to cross.

If said flag value for rest status is true, then said central computer evaluating behavior of said angle for heading for said direction of said pedestrian, before and during a stop event; a computation module integrating yaw rate for said pedestrian, for a second time period, to get an integrated yaw rate; said central computer receiving said integrated yaw rate from said computation module; said central computer offsetting said angle for heading for said direction of said pedestrian by said integrated yaw rate, to get a corrected angle for heading for said direction of said pedestrian; said central computer determining if said pedestrian is stopping, using said corrected angle for heading for said direction of said pedestrian; if said central computer detects that said pedestrian is walking, said central computer evaluating how said corrected angle for heading for said direction of said pedestrian correlates with a recent value of said angle for heading for said direction of said pedestrian.

Other features are:

monitoring multiple people.

monitoring multiple cars.

monitoring multiple intersections.

warning multiple people.

warning multiple cars.

monitoring multiple global positioning values.

monitoring multiple global positioning devices.

communicating with multiple satellites.

communicating with multiple telephone companies.

communicating with multiple service providers.

connecting cars with pedestrians.

communicating with cars.

communicating with pedestrians.

communicating with cloud.

communicating with server farms.

communicating with police.

alarming police.

scanning intersections with more than 4 outlets or roads.

correcting position data by local devices positioned at intersections, based on interactions with cell phones of pedestrians nearby, to register and record the position, and then later, compare those with other data, e.g., by satellite or GPS or maps.

Here are some examples: FIG. 41 is for one embodiment of the invention, for a system, for pedestrians moving at the intersection for a road. FIG. 42 is for one embodiment of the invention, for a system, for direction, for the angle with respect to the coordinate system, with N-E axes. FIG. 43 is for one embodiment of the invention, for a system, for direction, for the intended intersection paths, for possibilities.

FIG. 44 is for one embodiment of the invention, for a system, for pedestrian speed, before and after the stop. FIG. 45 is for one embodiment of the invention, for a system, for pedestrian movement, for positions, plus position at rest. FIG. 46 is for one embodiment of the invention, for a system, for pedestrian acceleration, with consistent behavior, plus deceleration to stop. FIG. 47 is for one embodiment of the invention, for a system, for angle, before the stop, plus the delta angle, or the difference in angle.

FIG. 48 is for one embodiment of the invention, for a system, for angle, during the stop. FIG. 49 is for one embodiment of the invention, for a system, for yaw rate. FIG. 50 is for one embodiment of the invention, for a system, for yaw rate integration. FIG. 51 is for one embodiment of the invention, for a system, for acceleration measurements.

FIG. 52 is for one embodiment of the invention, for a system, for intended intersection paths. FIG. 53 is for one embodiment of the invention, for a system, for position at move and position at rest. FIG. 54 is for one embodiment of the invention, for a system, for yaw rate and yaw rate integration.

FIG. 55 is for one embodiment of the invention, for a system, for communications between and from telephone company and satellite, to/from person's mobile phone or device, as well as the moving car, to connect the car with the mobile device/phone/smart phone, for understanding the position(s) of the pedestrian(s) at the intersections for the roads, by the moving car, nearby. FIG. 56 is for one embodiment of the invention, for a method of implementation of tracking pedestrian heading angle using smart phones data for pedestrian safety applications.

In this disclosure, any computing device, such as processor, microprocessor(s), computer, PC, pad, laptop, server, server farm, multi-cores, telephone, mobile device, smart glass, smart phone, computing system, tablet, or PDA can be used. The communication can be done by or using sound, laser, optical, magnetic, electromagnetic, wireless, wired, antenna, pulsed, encrypted, encoded, or combination of the above. The vehicles can be car, sedan, truck, bus, pickup truck, SUV, tractor, agricultural machinery, entertainment vehicles, motorcycle, bike, bicycle, hybrid, or the like. The roads can be one-lane county road, divided highway, boulevard, multi-lane road, one-way road, two-way road, or city street. Any variations of the above teachings are also intended to be covered by this patent application. 

1. A method for positioning quality filter for a global navigation system for a vehicle, said method comprising: a central computer receiving global positioning system location data; said central computer receiving sensors data from vehicle sensors; said central computer calculating a first metric value; a processor receiving a first threshold; said processor comparing said first metric value with said first threshold; in case said first metric value is smaller than said first threshold, said processor setting a global navigation system value as invalid; in case said first metric value is larger than or equal to said first threshold, said processor receiving a second threshold; a) said central computer calculating a second metric value; b) said processor comparing said second metric value with said second threshold; c) in case said second metric value is larger than or equal to said second threshold, said processor setting said global navigation system value as invalid; d) in case said second metric value is smaller than said second threshold, said processor receiving a third threshold; a. said central computer calculating a third metric value; b. said processor comparing said third metric value with said third threshold; c. in case said third metric value is smaller than said third threshold, said processor setting said global navigation system value as valid; d. in case said third metric value is larger than or equal to said third threshold, said processor receiving a fourth threshold; i. said central computer calculating a fourth metric value; ii. said processor comparing said fourth metric value with said fourth threshold; iii. in case said fourth metric value is smaller than said fourth threshold, said processor setting said global navigation system value as valid; iv. in case said fourth metric value is larger than or equal to said fourth threshold, said processor setting said global navigation system value as invalid; said central computer validating said global positioning system location data using said global navigation system value, for safety, operation, or navigation of said vehicle.
 2. The method for positioning quality filter for a global navigation system for a vehicle, as recited in claim 1, wherein said first threshold is not greater than
 1. 3. The method for positioning quality filter for a global navigation system for a vehicle, as recited in claim 1, said method comprises: getting data for said vehicle speed.
 4. The method for positioning quality filter for a global navigation system for a vehicle, as recited in claim 1, said method comprises: getting data for said vehicle direction.
 5. The method for positioning quality filter for a global navigation system for a vehicle, as recited in claim 1, said method comprises: getting data for said vehicle yaw rate.
 6. The method for positioning quality filter for a global navigation system for a vehicle, as recited in claim 1, said method comprises: correcting said vehicle's direction.
 7. The method for positioning quality filter for a global navigation system for a vehicle, as recited in claim 1, said method comprises: warning an operator.
 8. The method for positioning quality filter for a global navigation system for a vehicle, as recited in claim 1, said method comprises: warning an driver.
 9. The method for positioning quality filter for a global navigation system for a vehicle, as recited in claim 1, said method comprises: warning headquarters.
 10. The method for positioning quality filter for a global navigation system for a vehicle, as recited in claim 1, said method comprises: warning a central server.
 11. The method for positioning quality filter for a global navigation system for a vehicle, as recited in claim 1, said method comprises: warning another driver.
 12. The method for positioning quality filter for a global navigation system for a vehicle, as recited in claim 1, said method comprises: warning another car.
 13. The method for positioning quality filter for a global navigation system for a vehicle, as recited in claim 1, said method comprises: communicating with pedestrians.
 14. The method for positioning quality filter for a global navigation system for a vehicle, as recited in claim 1, said method comprises: communicating with cloud.
 15. The method for positioning quality filter for a global navigation system for a vehicle, as recited in claim 1, said method comprises: communicating with server farms.
 16. The method for positioning quality filter for a global navigation system for a vehicle, as recited in claim 1, said method comprises: communicating with police.
 17. The method for positioning quality filter for a global navigation system for a vehicle, as recited in claim 1, said method comprises: communicating with a grid, a secured network, or outside car sensors.
 18. The method for positioning quality filter for a global navigation system for a vehicle, as recited in claim 1, said method comprises: resolving conflict between sensors and/or received data.
 19. A method for positioning quality filter for a positioning system for an automated or autonomous vehicle, said method comprising: a central computer receiving global positioning system location data; said central computer receiving sensors data from vehicle sensors; said central computer calculating a first metric value; a processor receiving a first threshold; said processor comparing said first metric value with said first threshold; in case said first metric value is smaller than said first threshold, said processor setting a system value as invalid; in case said first metric value is larger than or equal to said first threshold, said processor receiving a second threshold; a) said central computer calculating a second metric value; b) said processor comparing said second metric value with said second threshold; c) in case said second metric value is larger than or equal to said second threshold, said processor setting said system value as invalid; d) in case said second metric value is smaller than said second threshold, said processor receiving a third threshold; v. said central computer calculating a third metric value; vi. said processor comparing said third metric value with said third threshold; vii. in case said third metric value is smaller than said third threshold, said processor setting said system value as valid; viii. in case said third metric value is larger than or equal to said third threshold, said processor receiving a fourth threshold; I. said central computer calculating a fourth metric value; II. said processor comparing said fourth metric value with said fourth threshold; III. in case said fourth metric value is smaller than said fourth threshold, said processor setting said system value as valid; IV. in case said fourth metric value is larger than or equal to said fourth threshold, said processor setting said system value as invalid; said central computer validating or correcting said positioning system for said automated or autonomous vehicle.
 20. A method for positioning quality filter for a safety applications or warning system for an automated or autonomous vehicle, said method comprising: a central computer receiving global positioning system location data; said central computer receiving sensors data from vehicle sensors; said central computer calculating a first metric value; a processor receiving a first threshold; said processor comparing said first metric value with said first threshold; in case said first metric value is smaller than said first threshold, said processor setting a system value as invalid; in case said first metric value is larger than or equal to said first threshold, said processor receiving a second threshold; e) said central computer calculating a second metric value; f) said processor comparing said second metric value with said second threshold; g) in case said second metric value is larger than or equal to said second threshold, said processor setting said system value as invalid; h) in case said second metric value is smaller than said second threshold, said processor receiving a third threshold; ix. said central computer calculating a third metric value; x. said processor comparing said third metric value with said third threshold; xi. in case said third metric value is smaller than said third threshold, said processor setting said system value as valid; xii. in case said third metric value is larger than or equal to said third threshold, said processor receiving a fourth threshold; I. said central computer calculating a fourth metric value; II. said processor comparing said fourth metric value with said fourth threshold; III. in case said fourth metric value is smaller than said fourth threshold, said processor setting said system value as valid; IV. in case said fourth metric value is larger than or equal to said fourth threshold, said processor setting said system value as invalid; said central computer validating or correcting said safety applications or warning system for said automated or autonomous vehicle. 